[LuisPolis]

Para o pessoal que diz que as ambulâncias blindadas não são prioridade. Efeito de estilhaços numa ambulância.
Modelo Linza: https://armyrecognition.com/defense_news_december_2020_global_security_army_industry/kamaz_linza_armored_ambulance_inducted_in_russian_military_base_in_tajikistan.html

[Drecas]

Provavelmente o único equipamento que a Rússia conseguiu fazer de jeito nos últimos anos

[HSMW]

How Many Tanks Does Russia Really Have? And Where Are They?

[LuisPolis]

O anterior chefe de estado maior Russo (General of the Army Yuri Baluyevsky: 2004-2008) acredita (lições da guerra da Ucrania) que a guerra de futuro será feita de munições inteligentes que tornarão obsoletos os carros blindados e a artilharia tradicional.

As a result of the re-equipment of the armies of the world with multiple launch rocket systems, similar to the recently become famous American MLRS HIMARS, the forms of warfare will radically change. As a result, according to Baluyevsky, such re-equipment can "lead to the complete withering away of armored vehicles and artillery in their traditional form."

Tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and guns simply will not survive in the conditions of massive use of precision-guided munitions, and the exit of tanks to the distance of using their main weapons becomes almost impossible

In the author's preface to the recently published CAST book "Alien Wars - a New Paradigm", Baluevsky also writes that "simple Chinese-made commercial quadrocopters have made a real revolution in the use of traditional cannon and rocket artillery." According to the author, the use of reconnaissance UAVs makes it possible to multiply the effectiveness and accuracy of strikes, which makes traditional artillery comparable in this indicator to high-precision weapons.

Also, the nature of warfare is already changing, taking into account the presence of high-precision long-range weapons in service with military aircraft, Baluyevsky believes. The introduction of elements of artificial intelligence, autonomous methods of missile guidance, allows aviation, according to the general, to strike up to thousands of kilometers, while remaining outside the zone of destruction of enemy air defense systems.

[HSMW]

Rubber Instead of Reactive Armour. How Russian Tanks Are Protected

Russian corruption made tanks of Russian army even more vulnerable. Ukrainian tank mechanics were surprised to discover that the dynamic protection of Russian tanks is filled with rubber, if any.

It is funny how Russian trolls are trying to claim that these are "NERA", i.e. Non-explosive Reactive Armour, - the technology that Russia simply does not have on its tanks. Here is more on this:

Those are supposed to be Kontakt 5 bricks containing, in order from the top: 15mm metal plate, one 4S22 explosive element containing 0.33 kg of HE, 20mm rubber pad, two more 4S22 explosive elements separated by a metal plate, as per this handy cutaway:
https://cdn-live.warthunder.com/uploa...

And just to make it absolutely clear,this is what is supposed to be in these bricks:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Y80USDqf1hY...
(this is one of the large rectangular panels on the side of a T72B3 M, containing twelve 4S22 explosive elements - the green things). What we see in this video is just the rubber pads and what looks like cardboard which is not supposed to be there.

And before someone else calls bullshit on it, quoted from this website:
https://thesovietarmourblog.blogspot....

"During the the First Chechen War, many tanks had their 4S22 explosives stolen and sold on the black market due to the poor economic conditions of Russia at the time and the extremely poor living conditions of Army servicemen. Kontakt-1 bricks were not filled during peacetime for safety reasons. According to protocol, they would only be filled during preparations for a military operation, but many tanks in Chechnya were left empty partially due to the haste of the preparations (hundreds of bricks on each tank makes it a tedious chore) and due to theft. As a result of a combination of these unfortunate circumstances, many tanks rode into Grozny with Kontakt-1 bricks, but with no explosives inside. Similar cases of theft have been reported recently in Ukraine."

TL:DR a) theft of the explosives is commonplace and b) the explosive was supposed to be installed manually before going to war so laziness, incompetence or simply no fucks given could also have been a factor.

[CruzSilva]

O anterior chefe de estado maior Russo (General of the Army Yuri Baluyevsky: 2004-2008) acredita (lições da guerra da Ucrania) que a guerra de futuro será feita de munições inteligentes que tornarão obsoletos os carros blindados e a artilharia tradicional.

As a result of the re-equipment of the armies of the world with multiple launch rocket systems, similar to the recently become famous American MLRS HIMARS, the forms of warfare will radically change. As a result, according to Baluyevsky, such re-equipment can "lead to the complete withering away of armored vehicles and artillery in their traditional form."

Tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and guns simply will not survive in the conditions of massive use of precision-guided munitions, and the exit of tanks to the distance of using their main weapons becomes almost impossible

In the author's preface to the recently published CAST book "Alien Wars - a New Paradigm", Baluevsky also writes that "simple Chinese-made commercial quadrocopters have made a real revolution in the use of traditional cannon and rocket artillery." According to the author, the use of reconnaissance UAVs makes it possible to multiply the effectiveness and accuracy of strikes, which makes traditional artillery comparable in this indicator to high-precision weapons.

Also, the nature of warfare is already changing, taking into account the presence of high-precision long-range weapons in service with military aircraft, Baluyevsky believes. The introduction of elements of artificial intelligence, autonomous methods of missile guidance, allows aviation, according to the general, to strike up to thousands of kilometers, while remaining outside the zone of destruction of enemy air defense systems.

No que toca a alta precisão para a artilharia russa a única munição que conheço é a Krasnopol (guiada a laser).

[HSMW]

[HSMW]

Epic footage shows Russian tank being ambushed by Ukrainian forces in Kharkiv Oblast today.
At least 4 Russian forces are falling off or jumping off the tank before the tank finally crashed into a tree.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1568288910006009856

[Hammerhead]

Epic footage shows Russian tank being ambushed by Ukrainian forces in Kharkiv Oblast today.
At least 4 Russian forces are falling off or jumping off the tank before the tank finally crashed into a tree.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1568288910006009856

Há paranóicos esquizofrénicos que dizem que estamos a travar uma guerra na Ucrânia para defender e proteger a Europa e a liberdade porque o exército russo é A ameaça para o Ocidente, porque, segundo eles, o exército russo é demasiado poderoso! Os mesmos belicistas afirmam agora que o exército russo está a ser derrotado pelo exército ucraniano e pelos seus patrocinadores da NATO! Assim, mais uma vez, estão a contradizer-se totalmente a si próprios. Muito eles gostam da narrativa jubilosa da fraqueza e desorganização do exército russo e da valentia do exército ucraniano... a ouvi-los falar, não há então risco de facto, não há risco de que a Rússia, com a sua fraqueza estrutural, invada a Europa... são aqueles mesmo que nos diziam que uma bela manhã Putin acordou com o desejo de visitar a Polónia, Alemanha, França e vir restabelecer a URSS em todo o território europeu! Mais uma vez repito, nem a Russia nem a China são uma ameaça... se a Rússia é tão fraca, o que se deve temer... se já está tão atolada na Ucrânia, como irá invadir a Europa? Assim, vemos que a narrativa oficial pró-NATO está a martelar-se a cabeça sem que ninguém reaja e veja a contradição gritante. Ou o exército russo é muito forte e a narrativa de que está a perder a guerra é estúpida, ou o exército russo é particularmente fraco e a narrativa de uma invasão da Europa é igualmente estúpida! Em resumo, o que os pró-guerra de Bruxelas e pró-NATO querem é fazer guerra para apoiar e agradar aos EUA, nada mais! Ao fim quem paga a fatura é o povo europeu!

[Icterio]

Muito eles gostam da narrativa jubilosa da fraqueza e desorganização do exército russo e da valentia do exército ucraniano...

Estes dias devem ter sido desmoralizantes para ti e para os camaradas...  Como estão a correr as coisas na "operação militar especial"?...

 

[Cabeça de Martelo]

SE alguém acha isto normal, por favor avance e indique.

https://twitter.com/AnonOpsSE/status/1569653772246196225?s=20&t=6K7Cu7-IzAZBcHUMKOeqOw

[Icterio]

Vi esse video ontem.  È uma tristeza, um crime.  È o fantástico exército russo em todo o seu esplendor.

Agradeçam aos patrioteiros putin, seus comparsas e simpatizantes.

[mafets]

Durante os anos da União Soviética a propaganda era aos potes. Durante a última década, quando dava jeito, os Rogeiros de serviço vinham agitar a bandeira do poderio Russo. Esqueciam-se destas imagens que perduraram até ao inicio dos anos 90, em que nem um simples Radio os veículos tinham. Em 20/30 anos não mudou muita coisa... 

 

Saudações

[Luso]

Começo a pensar que os nossos oficiais de alta patente devem ser formados por Moscovo.
Explicaria muita coisa.

[HSMW]

em que nem um simples Radio os veículos tinham. Em 20/30 anos não mudou muita coisa... 

Onde é que já vi isso...